Critical Appreciation of my 4th post about week 4
Features to cover :
1 Word by word
2 Spelling and grammar/ No slang
3 Does your writing convey your ideas effectively? (Yes or No) Describe how and why?
4 Gestalt/Wholeness : how well does the title and content both visually and textually compliment each other?
BAND BAAJA BANQUET!
The title of the post is very catchy and colourful but as Chris ma'am said it comes off as a little contrast to the way the content is written. The title may seem informal and personalized but the write up is put together in a very formal manner.
Therefore it disturbs the balance of the post in whole. Even though the language and grammar is correct without any spelling mistakes, the writing seems to be a little restricted and not in a certain flow. The post does capture the ideas of the title, It conveys my ideas effectively as all the main points are covered and as a whole the post is complete and apt. The words are pretty much to the point. Overall the blog is pretty factual too. The colour scheme of the blog and the posts are pleasing to the eyes. Also the blog post is pictorial and not just textual which evokes the interest of the reader too.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)